Chronicle 2036 · The Year of the Missed Turnings

17 October 2026, as the history books will tell it on 17 October 2036.

A history book from the future about today: how a ceasefire stayed on paper, how the court in The Hague was paralysed, and why aid reached only a third of the hungry.

This book never has to be published. Every different choice made today deletes a page from it.

Highlighted text has already happened. The rest is the bleakest course the news still makes credible.

Start reading 7-minute read
Scenario · not a predictionEdition 3 · always exactly ten years ahead · rewritten on Saturday, 17 October 2026

Highlighted text

Really happened, confirmed by at least two independent sources. The red number points to the sources in the margin.

Plain text

Is the scenario: the bleakest plausible course, as a historian in 2036 would write it down.

Timeline and rewrite

Each section shows how one choice from 2026 plays out until 2036, and which different choice could still prevent it.

Chapter 1

War & peace

How the ceasefires of 2026 existed mostly on paper, and why the court meant to try war crimes was strangled at exactly that moment.

§ 1.1

A ceasefire on paper

In October 2026 the war in Ukraine briefly seemed to move. On 9 October President Trump announced a deal with Vladimir Putin on supplies of Russian diesel. The same day the US Treasury temporarily eased sanctions on Russian diesel, until April 2027.1,2 A day later Trump told reporters: “I think it’s time for Ukraine to get a new president.”3,4

Historians see that week as the moment the pressure changed direction. It was not the aggressor who had to give ground, but the country under attack. On 11 October Trump announced an ‘energy ceasefire’ that he said both sides had agreed to. Ukraine stopped striking Russian refineries, but Russia kept attacking Ukrainian energy facilities.5,6,7

Moscow drew the lesson from that week that would shape the rest of the decade: whoever keeps fighting gets concessions.

From choice to consequence
  1. 11 Oct 2026 · happenedPressure on Kyiv to stop; sanctions on Russian diesel eased.
  2. 2027 · scenarioA truce on Russian terms. Occupied territories stay Russian, no security guarantees.
  3. 2030 · scenarioA rebuilt Russian army tests the border with the Baltic states.
  4. 2036 · scenarioEurope spends more on defence than at any time since the Cold War, at the expense of healthcare and education.
What rewrites this

Pressure on the country that started the war, not on the country defending itself. Sanctions that stay in place until there is a mutual, verified ceasefire.

§ 1.2

The Hague under lock

On 9 October 2026 the South African jurist Navi Pillay, a former judge at the International Criminal Court, was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. A few hours later the Trump administration imposed sanctions on the court itself. Secretary of State Marco Rubio declared: “Either the ICC will end its threats, or we will end the ICC.”1,2,4 The court called the sanctions an assault on the rule of law and on the very foundations of the international legal order, and wrote: “History will judge this moment.”1,3

In this book, that judgement is harsh. A six-month grace period initially applied to many transactions with the court.1,2,5 When it expired in April 2027, banks, insurers and software suppliers pulled out. The court in The Hague was largely paralysed and a handful of member states walked away. Trump had already called for that at the UN General Assembly on 22 September 2026: “I call on all nations that are members of the ICC to officially resign from this rogue institution immediately.”6,7

With that, the last place where leaders had to answer for war crimes disappeared. What that meant can be read in Sudan (§ 3.1).

From choice to consequence
  1. 9 Oct 2026 · happenedUS imposes sanctions on the International Criminal Court.
  2. April 2027 · scenarioTransition period expires; banks and suppliers pull out.
  3. 2028 · scenarioThe court is paralysed, a handful of member states walk away.
  4. 2036 · scenarioWar crimes are documented, no longer prosecuted.
What rewrites this

European member states that shield the court financially and legally, and a US Congress that reverses the sanctions.

§ 1.3

A ceasefire that kept killing

On 10 October 2025 a ceasefire took effect in Gaza.1,5 By mid-June 2026, according to the health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza, more than a thousand Palestinians had nevertheless been killed since.2,3 In early October 2026 the death toll since the Hamas attack of 7 October 2023 stood at more than 74,000, according to the same ministry.4,5

The ceasefire remained a ceasefire on paper. Reconstruction never got going, because no one wanted to pay for what could be destroyed again tomorrow. A generation of children grew up among the rubble, without school and without prospects. Without a political solution, radicalisation grew on both sides.

From choice to consequence
  1. Oct 2025 · happenedA ceasefire without political prospects; the killing goes on.
  2. 2027 · scenarioReconstruction fails to start; donors wait and see.
  3. 2031 · scenarioA generation grows up without school, among the rubble.
  4. 2036 · scenarioGaza enters the books as a war that never really ended.
What rewrites this

A ceasefire that truly stops the killing, free access for aid and reconstruction, and a political future for both peoples.

Chapter 2

Economy

How a narrow strait set the price at the pump, and why growth became concentrated in ever fewer countries.

§ 2.1

The strait and the price at the pump

After US-Israeli strikes on Iran on 28 February 2026, Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz.1,2 From 13 April the US blockaded Iranian ports.3,4 On 8 July, after Iranian attacks on merchant ships and US counter-strikes, Trump declared the interim ceasefire over.5,6

Fuel prices even became an argument in the war in Ukraine (§ 1.1). In this way the fuel crisis of 2026 hit all four pillars at once. Governments subsidised fossil fuels to prevent unrest, and investment in the energy transition was postponed by another year, again and again (§ 4.1).

From choice to consequence
  1. Feb 2026 · happenedStrikes on Iran; the strait becomes a front line.
  2. 2027 · scenarioGovernments subsidise fossil fuels; the energy transition is postponed.
  3. 2030 · scenarioThe Gulf remains permanently militarised.
  4. 2036 · scenarioEvery incident in the strait sends prices in Europe soaring.
What rewrites this

A negotiated, verified agreement on free passage, and European energy that depends less on straits and autocrats.

§ 2.2

Growth for the few

On 13 October 2026 the IMF projected global growth of 3.1 percent for 2026 and global inflation of 4.7 percent. That forecast assumed oil and gas shipments through the Strait of Hormuz would resume by March 2027.1,2 In this book they did not, and inflation persisted.

The IMF also found that just 32 economies accounted for 95 percent of global growth, down from 54 in April. It warned of an AI-related stock market correction, rising government bond yields and high public debt.1,2 The warnings came true. The market correction hit pension funds and savers, and heavily indebted governments could not step in. The gap between the few countries that shared in the gains and everyone else became the economic story of the decade.

From choice to consequence
  1. 13 Oct 2026 · happenedIMF warns: growth ever more concentrated, debts too high.
  2. March 2027 · scenarioThe strait stays closed, inflation persists.
  3. 2028 · scenarioA market correction hits pensions; governments cut spending.
  4. 2036 · scenarioThe gap between and within countries feeds distrust of politics.
What rewrites this

Investing in broad-based growth and debt relief for the poorest countries, instead of betting everything on one technology and one energy source.

Chapter 3

Hunger & poverty

How famine returned as a weapon, and why aid was scaled back at exactly that moment.

§ 3.1

Hunger as a weapon

On 26 October 2025, after a siege of some eighteen months, the RSF militia took the Sudanese city of El Fasher.1,2,3 In early November 2025 the international hunger classification system IPC officially confirmed famine in El Fasher and in Kadugli.4,5

Hunger then spread across Kordofan, and the country effectively broke apart into territories held by rival armies. Because the International Criminal Court was being strangled at the same time (§ 1.2), no one stood trial for starving cities. The book of 2036 calls Sudan the crisis the world watched and let happen.

From choice to consequence
  1. Oct–Nov 2025 · happenedEl Fasher falls after an eighteen-month siege; famine confirmed.
  2. 2027 · scenarioHunger spreads across Kordofan.
  3. 2029 · scenarioSudan breaks apart into territories of rival armies.
  4. 2036 · scenarioThe largest displacement crisis of the decade, without a single conviction.
What rewrites this

An arms embargo that is actually enforced, including against the countries arming the warring parties, and safe routes for food.

§ 3.2

Aid for a third

The UN World Food Programme projected that 318 million people would face crisis-level hunger or worse in 2026, more than double the number in 2019. Because of funding cuts, it said it could help only about a third of them. The US, the largest donor, cut its foreign aid, and other donor countries made cuts too.1,2,3

In the years that followed, rich countries shifted even more money to defence and energy (§ 1.1, § 2.1). Those who received no help set out on the road. On the night of 8 to 9 October 2026 an overcrowded migrant boat bound for Yemen capsized off the coast of Djibouti. According to the UN migration agency IOM, at least 139 people died, 15 of them children.4,5,6 In this book that was not an incident but an omen. The debate on migration hardened, leaving even less political room to tackle the causes.

From choice to consequence
  1. 2026 · happenedDonors cut back; aid reaches a third of those facing hunger.
  2. 2028 · scenarioAid budgets shrink further, in favour of defence and energy.
  3. 2031 · scenarioMore people flee; more boat disasters.
  4. 2036 · scenarioA hardened migration debate pushes the causes out of sight.
What rewrites this

Aid that grows with need, instead of moving with attention.

Chapter 4

Climate

How the fuel crisis pushed climate policy aside, just when it was time to put the climate goals into practice.

§ 4.1

From promise to proof

The COP31 climate summit was scheduled for 9 to 20 November 2026 in Antalya, with Türkiye as host. Following the previous summit in Belém, Brazil, it was to focus on implementation: putting the climate goals into practice.1,2

The summit fell in the middle of the fuel crisis (§ 2.1), and the short term won. Countries kept their targets on paper, but implementation slipped. Around 2030, 1.5 degrees of warming had been structurally reached. In the Netherlands, the debate in the 2030s shifted from how to prevent it to what it costs to raise the dikes, and who pays.

From choice to consequence
  1. Nov 2026 · scheduledCOP31 in Antalya, in the middle of the fuel crisis.
  2. 2027 · scenarioTargets stay on paper, implementation slips.
  3. 2030 · scenario1.5 degrees of warming is structurally reached.
  4. 2036 · scenarioThe Netherlands debates raising its dikes, and who pays.
What rewrites this

Climate policy that is not sacrificed to the fuel crisis, but seen as the way out of it.

Review questions

  1. Explain why this book treats the week of 9 to 12 October 2026 as a turning point in the war in Ukraine. (chapter 1)
  2. What link does this book draw between the sanctions against the International Criminal Court and the famine in Sudan? (chapters 1 and 3)
  3. Describe how the crisis in the Strait of Hormuz affected both the economy and climate policy. (chapters 2 and 4)
  4. Choose one decision from October 2026 and describe which pages of this book would disappear if it had gone differently.
To those who read this and decide today

This book never has to be printed.

Every day it is rewritten from the news. Every different choice deletes a section. Which pages remain is up to you.

The best donation

Pass this book on

This book costs nothing and asks for nothing. It only works if it is read, ideally by those who decide today. Send it to one person who needs to read it.

This history book about 2026 never has to be published. Read how 2036 looks back on today's choices, and pass it on. https://notyetprinted.org