From the archive: the edition of 23 October 2026. Read today's edition

From the history books of 2036 · Looking back on today

23 October 2026, as the history books will tell it on 23 October 2036.

As the history books of 2036 will tell it: how talks were promised while missiles still fell on Ukraine, how oil climbed to its highest price in five months, and how the UN braced for an El Niño that threatened millions with hunger.

The history books of 2036 will be written either way. Every choice we make differently today rewrites a chapter.

Start reading 9-minute read
Edition 8 · always exactly ten years ahead · rewritten on Friday, 23 October 2026 at 06:00 UTC
New in the past 24 hours

Highlighted text

This really happened and is confirmed by at least two independent sources. The red number refers to the sources in the margin. A small ‘new’ label marks facts added in the past 24 hours.

Plain text

This is the scenario: the bleakest plausible course of events, as a historian in 2036 would record it. If the expected course changes, the section is marked ‘scenario updated’.

Timeline and how we can change it

Each section shows how a single choice made in 2026 plays out up to 2036, and which different choice we could still make to prevent it.

Chapter 1

War & peace

How the ceasefires of 2026 existed mostly on paper, and why the pressure shifted onto the country under attack.

§ 1.1

A ceasefire on paper

new facts

In October 2026 the pressure in the war in Ukraine changed direction. In the first half of the month the US eased its sanctions on Russian diesel until April 2027 and waived the main measures of a new Russia sanctions law, including tariffs of up to 100 per cent on major buyers of Russian oil and gas.1,2,3,4 President Trump also said: “I think it’s time for Ukraine to get a new president.”5,6 An ‘energy ceasefire’ he announced on 11 October did not stop Russian attacks on Ukrainian energy facilities.7,8

After US envoy Steve Witkoff met Vladimir Putin on 21 October, the Kremlin said Russia was willing to resume three-way talks with the US and Ukraine after 10 November; President Zelensky backed this.9,10,11,12 newWithin hours, Russian missiles and drones struck Kyiv and other regions, killing at least four people, according to Ukrainian officials. Some carried cluster warheads, Zelensky said.10,13,14,15

Moscow drew the lesson that would shape the rest of the decade: keep fighting, and the concessions will come.

From choice to consequence
  1. 22 Oct 2026 · happenedTalks promised for November; within hours, missiles kill at least four in Ukraine.
  2. 2027 · scenarioA truce on Russian terms: occupied land stays Russian, with no security guarantees.
  3. 2030 · scenarioA rebuilt Russian army tests the border with the Baltic states.
  4. 2036 · scenarioGlobal arms spending reaches its highest level since the Cold War, at the expense of health and education.
How we can still change it

If countries put pressure on the aggressor rather than on the country defending itself, and lift sanctions only for a fair, verified ceasefire, no country will learn that invading a neighbour pays.

§ 1.2

A ceasefire that kept killing

On 10 October 2025 a ceasefire took effect in Gaza.1,3 Even so, by 20 October 2026 more than 1,500 Palestinians had been killed since it took effect, according to the health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza.4,5,6 In early October 2026 the death toll since the Hamas attack of 7 October 2023 stood at more than 74,000, according to the same ministry.2,3

Reconstruction never began, because no one wanted to pay for what might be destroyed again. A generation of children grew up among the rubble without schooling, and without a political solution radicalisation grew on both sides.

From choice to consequence
  1. Oct 2025 · happenedA ceasefire with no political horizon; the killing goes on.
  2. 2027 · scenarioReconstruction fails to get going; donors hold back.
  3. 2031 · scenarioA generation grows up among the rubble, without schooling.
  4. 2036 · scenarioGaza goes down in history as a war that never really ended.
How we can still change it

If the killing truly stops, aid and reconstruction are given unhindered access and both peoples are offered a political future, no generation will have to grow up among the rubble.

Chapter 2

Law & freedom

How the court set up to try war crimes was strangled, and what happens when leaders no longer have to answer to anyone.

§ 2.1

A court in a stranglehold

new facts

On 9 October 2026, hours after the former International Criminal Court judge Navi Pillay won the Nobel Peace Prize, the Trump administration imposed sanctions on the court itself. Secretary of State Marco Rubio declared: “Either the ICC will end its threats, or we will end the ICC.”1,2,4 The court called the sanctions an assault on the rule of law. Many transactions with the court were initially covered by a six-month grace period.1,2,3,5 newOn 22 October the European Parliament awarded its Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought to the court and its staff.10,11,12

In the history books of 2036, the verdict is harsh: prizes did not protect the court. Trump had already urged member states at the UN General Assembly on 22 September 2026 to “resign from this rogue institution immediately”.6,7 The next day Nauru notified the UN that it was leaving the court, with effect after one year.8,9 When the grace period expired in April 2027, banks and suppliers pulled out and the court was largely paralysed.

With that, the last place where leaders could be held to account for war crimes disappeared. What that meant can be seen in Sudan (§ 4.1).

From choice to consequence
  1. 22 Oct 2026 · happenedEurope honours the court that the US has just sanctioned.
  2. April 2027 · scenarioGrace period expires; banks and suppliers pull out.
  3. 2028 · scenarioThe court is paralysed; a handful of member states withdraw.
  4. 2036 · scenarioWar crimes are still documented, but no longer prosecuted.
How we can still change it

If countries protect the International Criminal Court instead of weakening it, there will still be one place where any leader, anywhere in the world, can be held to account for war crimes.

Chapter 3

The economy

How a narrow strait set the price at the pump, and why growth became concentrated in fewer and fewer countries.

§ 3.1

The strait and the price at the pump

new facts

After US-Israeli strikes on Iran on 28 February 2026, Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz; from 13 April the US blockaded Iranian ports.1,2,3,4 On 8 July, after Iranian attacks on merchant ships and US counter-strikes, Trump declared the interim ceasefire over.5,6 On 20 October, according to Iranian state television, Iran’s security chief said no enriched uranium would leave the country and ruled out talks with the US until its conditions were met.7,8 newThe next day the US sanctioned firms that it said helped Iran’s ‘shadow fleet’ of oil tankers. On 22 October the price of Brent crude oil rose above 113 dollars a barrel, a five-month high.9,10,11,12

Governments subsidised fossil fuels to head off unrest and put off the energy transition year after year (§ 5.1).

From choice to consequence
  1. 22 Oct 2026 · happenedIran keeps its uranium, the US tightens sanctions and oil passes 113 dollars.
  2. 2027 · scenarioGovernments subsidise fossil fuels; the energy transition is put on hold.
  3. 2030 · scenarioThe Gulf remains permanently militarised.
  4. 2036 · scenarioEvery incident in the strait sends fuel and food prices soaring worldwide.
How we can still change it

If countries keep shipping straits open to all and depend less on oil and gas, a single conflict can no longer drive up fuel and food prices for billions of people.

§ 3.2

Growth for the few

On 13 October 2026 the IMF projected global growth of 3.1 per cent for 2026 and global inflation of 4.7 per cent. That forecast assumed oil and gas shipments through the Strait of Hormuz would resume by March 2027.1,2 They did not, and inflation stayed high.

The IMF also found that just 32 economies accounted for 95 per cent of global growth, down from 54 in April. It warned of an AI-related stock market correction, rising government bond yields and high public debt.1,2 According to the IMF, low-income countries were spending 14 per cent of their government revenue on debt payments, up from 6 per cent a decade earlier.3,4 The warnings came true: a market correction hit pensions and savings, and indebted governments could not step in.

From choice to consequence
  1. 13 Oct 2026 · happenedIMF warns that growth is ever more concentrated and debts too high.
  2. March 2027 · scenarioThe strait stays closed; inflation persists.
  3. 2028 · scenarioA market correction hits pensions; governments cut spending.
  4. 2036 · scenarioInequality between and within countries fuels distrust of politics.
How we can still change it

If the gains from technology and trade also reach the poorest countries and their debts are eased, the gap between rich and poor will not become the story of this decade.

Chapter 4

Hunger, disease & poverty

How famine returned as a weapon of war, why aid was cut just then, and what that meant when disease spread.

§ 4.1

Hunger as a weapon

On 26 October 2025, after an eighteen-month siege, the RSF militia took the Sudanese city of El Fasher; days later the IPC, the international hunger classification system, confirmed famine there and in Kadugli.1,2,3,4,5 On 12 October 2026 the IPC warned of a growing risk of famine in Darfur and Kordofan, driven by war, displacement and drought.6,7 On 19 October a drone strike on a market in Abyei, an area disputed between Sudan and South Sudan, killed at least 153 people, according to local officials, who blamed Sudan’s army.8,9 On 21 October 22 countries met in Geneva without Sudan’s warring parties. They urged outside powers to stop supplying drones, fighters and money, but no ceasefire was agreed.10,11

Because the International Criminal Court was being strangled at the same time (§ 2.1), no one was put on trial for starving whole cities. The history books of 2036 call Sudan the crisis the world watched and allowed to happen.

From choice to consequence
  1. 21 Oct 2026 · happenedDrones hit markets; peace talks in Geneva end without a ceasefire.
  2. 2027 · scenarioHunger spreads across Kordofan.
  3. 2029 · scenarioSudan breaks apart into territories held by rival armies.
  4. 2036 · scenarioThe largest displacement crisis of the decade, without a single conviction.
How we can still change it

If countries stop supplying weapons to those who starve cities, and safe corridors for food are opened, hunger will no longer be used as a weapon anywhere.

§ 4.2

Aid for one in three

The UN World Food Programme projected that 318 million people would face crisis-level hunger or worse in 2026 and said that because of funding cuts it could help only about a third of them. The US, the largest donor, and others cut their aid.1,2,3

What that meant became clear in Gaza (§ 1.2). On 19 October 2026 the WFP said that, for lack of funding, it was cutting food aid there by about a third, leaving 500,000 people without monthly support.7,8,9

In the years that followed, rich countries shifted even more money to defence and energy (§ 1.1, § 3.1), and those who received no help took to the road. In early October 2026 an overcrowded migrant boat bound for Yemen capsized off Djibouti; at least 139 people died, 15 of them children, according to the UN migration agency IOM.4,5,6

From choice to consequence
  1. 2026 · happenedDonors cut back; aid reaches a third of those facing hunger.
  2. 2028 · scenarioAid budgets shrink further as money shifts to defence and energy.
  3. 2031 · scenarioMore people flee, and more boats sink.
  4. 2036 · scenarioA hardened migration debate pushes the causes out of sight.
How we can still change it

If countries that can afford it let their aid keep pace with need, fewer people will have to leave their homes and fewer boats will sink.

§ 4.3

A disease without a vaccine

new facts

In May 2026 the World Health Organization (WHO) declared an Ebola outbreak in eastern Congo a public health emergency of international concern. It was caused by the Bundibugyo strain, for which there is no approved vaccine or treatment.1,2,3 By 20 October Congo had recorded more than 9,500 confirmed infections and more than 4,600 deaths, according to government figures: the second-largest Ebola outbreak on record.4,5,6 newThe virus also reached Uganda and Kenya, with nine cases by 20 October. That day Nigeria confirmed its first case, in a woman who had arrived from Uganda; according to the WHO, it was the fifth country to detect the virus. On 22 October the WHO called the outbreak a regional concern.4,12,13,14,15,18,19

Uganda closed its border with Congo in May, and the US admitted travellers from Congo only after 21 days outside the country, although the WHO advised against closing borders.1,4,7,8,10,11 newThe WHO reported serious gaps in funding for the response. In October the African Union’s health agency, Africa CDC, said that more than 700 million dollars in Ebola response funds in Congo could not be accounted for.7,9,16,17

Faced with the choice between closing borders and helping to pay for the response, the world mostly chose the former. The virus kept circulating in Africa well into 2027, and when the next epidemic came, vaccines and emergency funds were again missing.

From choice to consequence
  1. Oct 2026 · happenedEbola reaches a fifth country; the WHO calls it a regional concern.
  2. 2027 · scenarioThe virus keeps circulating; countries close borders instead of paying their share.
  3. 2030 · scenarioGlobal health money keeps shrinking; vaccine research stalls.
  4. 2036 · scenarioA new epidemic hits a world even less prepared for it.
How we can still change it

If countries help pay for the response and for vaccines, instead of only closing their borders, an outbreak will not become an epidemic that drags on for years.

Chapter 5

Climate & nature

How the fuel crisis pushed climate policy aside, just as the time came to turn climate goals into action.

§ 5.1

From promise to proof

new facts

The COP31 climate summit in Antalya, Türkiye, from 9 to 20 November 2026, was to focus on turning climate goals into action.1,2 newIn October the World Meteorological Organization and the Copernicus climate service reported a rapidly strengthening El Niño; the WMO warned that tropical Pacific sea temperatures could reach an unprecedented 3.8 degrees above average. On 21 October the UN warned that about 50 million people could face more hunger and released 50 million dollars in emergency funds for 11 countries.3,4,8,9,10,11 The same day the UN Environment Programme calculated that the world was heading for 2.6 degrees of warming by 2100 under current pledges, and 2.8 degrees under current policies: worse than a year earlier, partly because the US had left the Paris Agreement.5,6,7

With the summit held in the middle of the fuel crisis (§ 3.1), short-term concerns won out and targets stayed on paper. Around 2030 warming permanently exceeded 1.5 degrees, and coastal countries from Bangladesh to Egypt began arguing over who would pay for protection against the sea.

From choice to consequence
  1. 21 Oct 2026 · happenedUN: the world is heading for 2.6 to 2.8 degrees; COP31 meets in the middle of the fuel crisis.
  2. 2027 · scenarioTargets stay on paper; implementation slips.
  3. 2030 · scenarioWarming permanently exceeds 1.5 degrees.
  4. 2036 · scenarioCoastal countries, from Bangladesh to Egypt, argue over who pays for protection against the sea.
How we can still change it

If countries see climate policy as the way out of the fuel crisis instead of putting it off again, warming can be kept in check and fewer coasts, cities and harvests will be at risk.

For all of us, making today's choices

This version is not yet printed.

Twice a day it is rewritten in the light of the news. Every choice we make differently rewrites a chapter. Which chapters remain is up to all of us.

What we can do

Pass it on

Not Yet Printed costs nothing and asks for nothing. The more of us read it, the more likely it is that different choices are made. Send it to one person who ought to read it.

The history books of 2036 will be written either way. Read how they will look back on the choices we are making today, and pass it on. https://notyetprinted.org